Chinese CNC makers are not only catching up on the legacy ball-screw machine — a cluster is going around it, with full electromagnetic direct-drive (no ball screw at all) plus a self-made PWM (pulse-width-modulation) CNC "brain."
The article frames the old constraint as two interlocking "deadlocks" (死结) that confined Chinese machine tools to the low end for decades:
A conventional machine moves its table through a ball screw: a motor turns, a coupling turns the screw, the screw drives the nut, the nut pushes the table. Every joint is mechanical contact — friction, thermal drift under high speed, and a few microns of built-in backlash. Western makers spent roughly a century perfecting the materials and grinding of this part, so a late entrant started the race already behind.
On top of that sits the CNC system (FANUC / Siemens), described in the piece as a "black box" whose底层 code is never disclosed. A widely-reported industry concern (specific instances are not independently verified) is that some imported high-end machines carry sensors / positioning modules that can remotely lock the unit if it is moved or paired with another system — turning a capital asset into something that needs a foreign engineer's key to unlock. concern, unverified
Instead of pushing the table through a screw, the direct-drive architecture removes the coupling, screw and nut entirely. The table rides an electromagnetic field — the article's analogy is a maglev train — so a change in current produces motion directly. The result: zero backlash, no screw wear, and responsiveness at the nanosecond scale, ideal for soft, tool-sticking materials such as red copper.
The article credits a self-developed PWM (pulse-width-modulation) CNC system that controls electromagnetic force with high-frequency pulses. It claims the response latency was cut from roughly 100 µs to under 1 ns — a stated ~100,000× speed-up — comparing the jump to "going from 8-bit pixels to 8K." vendor claim, unverified
The piece states the core parts — high-end drivers, the Halbach permanent-magnet array and the control boards — are ~99.9% domestically sourced, so the "lock, the door frame and the building" were all replaced rather than picked. single-source claim Industry coverage ties this narrative to a domestic full-direct-drive CNC maker's STAR-market IPO filing (commonly identified as Kerex / 钶锐锶) updated at the Shanghai exchange in August 2026.
Why this matters technically: direct-drive swaps a single-point craft gap (century-old screw grinding) for a system-level capability (electromagnetics + power electronics + servo algorithms + supply chain). That is a genuinely different competitive axis — and it is the throughline of Gree's own in-house motion stack (linear motors, spindles, rotary tables).
The article's central, most buyer-relevant claim is where this shows up first:
The displacement argument only works on new production lines, and the article is explicit about why:
If you are a buyer, the honest split is:
Chinese direct-drive likely wins when: the work is high-mix, thin-wall, or soft / tool-sticking parts (liquid-cooling plates, 3C, EV long profiles, molds) where speed, zero-backlash and total cost dominate. Expect a fraction of German / Japanese pricing and far shorter lead times.
German / Japanese still lead when: you need ultra-long-term accuracy retention, aerospace / defence certification, 7×24 mission-critical uptime, or a deep process database baked into the controller.
Five-point pre-purchase checklist: (1) confirm the controller tier — self-made PWM vs bought-in; (2) demand a real test-cut plus a ≥6-month accuracy re-inspection clause; (3) pin down the brand / source and spare-lead-time of scales, screws and other key parts; (4) verify CE / target-market compliance; (5) ask for a reference site in your exact industry.
| Claim | Source | Credibility |
|---|---|---|
| Western "Big-3" hold >60% of China's high-end market | Self-media / commonly cited industry figure | Medium |
| PWM latency 100 µs → <1 ns (≈100,000× faster) | Self-media account | Low (unverified) |
| Core-part localization ≈99.9% | Self-media / Kerex IPO coverage | Low–Medium |
| Cold-plate micro-channels 0.1–0.2 mm wide | Self-media / reflects real AI-server spec | Medium |
| Remote-lock / geofencing of imported machines | Widely-reported industry concern | Medium (instances unverified) |
In specific high-precision, high-mix part families (liquid-cooling plates, 3C, EV long profiles, molds) a credible Chinese direct-drive machine can displace a Makino / GF / Röders-class machine at a fraction of cost. For ultra-long-term accuracy retention, aerospace / defence certification and 7x24 mission-critical work, German and Japanese makers still lead.
Full direct-drive (全直驱) removes the ball screw and all intermediate transmission parts; the table is pushed directly by an electromagnetic field (a linear motor), like a maglev train. There is zero backlash, no screw wear and nanosecond-level responsiveness — ideal for soft, tool-sticking materials such as red copper.
Treat them as vendor / self-media claims, not independently audited facts. Verify the controller tier (self-made PWM vs bought-in) and request a documented test-cut plus a long-cycle accuracy re-inspection before relying on them.
Gree's own direct-drive models (e.g. the GA-GF3755 high-speed profile machining center) target exactly these cold-plate, long-aluminium and NEV part families. As with any Chinese machine, insist on a real test-cut, an accuracy-reinspection clause and confirmed compliance for your target market.
Send your part material, tolerance and volume — we return a recommended model, spec sheet and quote within one business day.
Request a Quote →